Categories: PRESS RELEASE

Supreme Court issues historic ruling on presidential immunity



The Supreme Court has issued a historic ruling that a president is immune from criminal liability for official acts while in office, a decision with significant implications for former President Donald Trump’s case.The court ruled that any president is entitled to immunity for only official acts while in office.This ruling directly impacts the case against former President Donald Trump, who is charged with plotting to overturn the 2020 election. The case will now be sent back to the lower courts to decide whether those actions constitute an official act.The implications of this decision are far-reaching. Trump’s trials will likely be delayed while a lower court judge works through the indictment to decide which aspects are considered official acts and which ones could be subject to prosecution.Following the ruling, former President Trump responded on social media, calling this a “win for our Constitution and democracy.”In the wake of the ruling, Special Counsel Jack Smith’s office has declined to comment on the case.

The Supreme Court has issued a historic ruling that a president is immune from criminal liability for official acts while in office, a decision with significant implications for former President Donald Trump’s case.

The court ruled that any president is entitled to immunity for only official acts while in office.

This ruling directly impacts the case against former President Donald Trump, who is charged with plotting to overturn the 2020 election.

The case will now be sent back to the lower courts to decide whether those actions constitute an official act.

The implications of this decision are far-reaching. Trump’s trials will likely be delayed while a lower court judge works through the indictment to decide which aspects are considered official acts and which ones could be subject to prosecution.

Following the ruling, former President Trump responded on social media, calling this a “win for our Constitution and democracy.”

In the wake of the ruling, Special Counsel Jack Smith’s office has declined to comment on the case.



Source link

NewHampshireDigitalNews.com

Share
Published by
NewHampshireDigitalNews.com

Recent Posts

Chelsea Saw THAT Belly Touch & So Did We

That Look on Adam’s Face Said EverythingThat Dress Woman was rocking a zebra-print jacket &…

2 days ago

Giants players make feelings on Winston, McCarthy chatter clear

Chatter on social media about when first-year New York Giants head coach John Harbaugh could…

2 days ago

Russian Catholicism, Jazz, and AI Music w/ Timothy Flanders

Oct 2, 2026Timothy Flanders rejoins the podcast for a freewheeling conversation in which he and…

2 days ago

A Companion Resource for the 2025-2030 Dietary Guidelines

Reading Time: 2 minutesEvery five years, the USDA and DHHS release a new set of…

2 days ago

How Nicole Kidman’s ’90s Style Became a Blueprint for Modern Hollywood Glamour

Nicole Kidman’s fashion legacy did not begin with the dramatic couture gowns she would become…

2 days ago

The Role of Color in Joy and How to Support Your Retinal Health

1 What is the main reason your stroke risk rises right after you wake up?…

2 days ago