{"id":294768,"date":"2025-02-02T22:14:55","date_gmt":"2025-02-02T22:14:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/newhampshiredigitalnews.com\/index.php\/2025\/02\/02\/will-asteroid-2024-yr4-strike-earth-in-2032\/"},"modified":"2025-02-02T22:14:55","modified_gmt":"2025-02-02T22:14:55","slug":"will-asteroid-2024-yr4-strike-earth-in-2032","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/newhampshiredigitalnews.com\/index.php\/2025\/02\/02\/will-asteroid-2024-yr4-strike-earth-in-2032\/","title":{"rendered":"Will Asteroid 2024 YR4 Strike Earth in 2032?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p class=\"\" data-block=\"sciam\/paragraph\">In late December astronomers using the Asteroid Terrestrial-Impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) telescope in Chile observed a new asteroid near our planet. Dubbed 2024 YR4, the object\u2014somewhere between 40 and 100 meters in size\u2014was spotted on December 27. The asteroid\u2019s closest approach to Earth, it turned out, had been two days earlier, when YR4 was about 800,000 kilometers from our planet, roughly twice as far away as the moon. \u201cIt was zooming right by Earth,\u201d says John Tonry, an astronomer at the University of Hawaii. Such objects are not uncommon; there are thousands of asteroids of this size or greater in our region of the solar system. But this one warranted further attention to make sure it wouldn\u2019t pose a risk to our planet in future.<\/p>\n<p class=\"\" data-block=\"sciam\/paragraph\">Rather than ruling out an impact, however, follow-up observations have done quite the opposite. On January 27 a NASA service called Sentry, which monitors potential asteroid impacts by pooling together observations from telescopes around the world, upgraded the <a href=\"https:\/\/cneos.jpl.nasa.gov\/sentry\/details.html#?des=2024%20YR4\">risk of Y24<\/a> to our planet to an unprecedented degree. YR4, it seemed, had a 1.3 percent chance of hitting Earth on December 22, 2032. This assessment corresponds to a threat level of 3 on <a href=\"https:\/\/cneos.jpl.nasa.gov\/sentry\/torino_scale.html\">the Torino scale<\/a>, a metric that ranks the danger an asteroid poses to Earth on an ascending scale from 1 to 10. Two days later the European Space Agency (ESA) announced that it had estimated a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.esa.int\/Space_Safety\/Planetary_Defence\/ESA_actively_monitoring_near-Earth_asteroid_2024_YR4\">similar impact risk<\/a>, and as this story went to press NASA\u2019s Sentry service had upped the impact risk to 1.6 percent.<\/p>\n<p class=\"\" data-block=\"sciam\/paragraph\">The chance of an impact is still low. \u201cThere is a 99 percent probability that this is going to miss, and that\u2019s what we expect to happen,\u201d says Davide Farnocchia, a scientist at the Center for Near Earth Object Studies at NASA\u2019s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. This is a higher impact risk to our planet, however, than that of any asteroid since <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scientificamerican.com\/article\/nasa-spacecraft-will-visit-apophis-once-earth-rsquo-s-deadliest-asteroid-threat\/\">Apophis<\/a>, which, for a brief while in December 2004, was estimated to have a 2.7 percent chance of hitting our planet in 2029. Better observations of Apophis eventually refined its orbit so that astronomers could confidently say it would miss. They are expecting that to happen with YR4, too\u2014but so far, the ongoing analysis has been trending in the other direction. \u201cThe probability is increasing,\u201d says Juan Luis Cano, planetary defense coordinator at ESA\u2019s Near-Earth Object Coordination Center. And that might pose an interesting dilemma.<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<h2>On supporting science journalism<\/h2>\n<p>If you&#8217;re enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by<!-- --> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scientificamerican.com\/getsciam\/\">subscribing<\/a>. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p class=\"\" data-block=\"sciam\/paragraph\">If an asteroid the size of YR4 were to hit our planet, it would not end life on Earth, but it would be devastating. At that size, the impact would be equivalent to a \u201c10-megaton bomb,\u201d Tonry says\u2014more than enough to cause widespread regional decimation. \u201cEverything within three or four kilometers would be incinerated,\u201d Tonry says. \u201cEverything out to maybe 10 kilometers is smashed. It\u2019s not a nuclear explosion, but it\u2019s an extremely hot explosion. There would be a huge fireball that would start fires out to 15 kilometers, something like that. It would kill a lot of people if they haven\u2019t moved out of the way.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"\" data-block=\"sciam\/paragraph\">Observations suggest YR4 is a stony asteroid rather than a metal-rich one, says Melissa Brucker, a planetary scientist at the University of Arizona. That means it would likely explode from the pressure in the upper atmosphere instead of reaching Earth\u2019s surface. This could make its impact similar to the famous <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scientificamerican.com\/article\/the-tunguska-mystery-100-years-later\/\">Tunguska event in 1908<\/a>, when a suspected asteroid or comet burst over Russia and flattened 2,150 square kilometers of remote Siberian forest. \u201cWe think YR4 is about the same size as the Tunguska event [object],\u201d Brucker says. A more recent example of such an impact occurred in 2013, when a meteor estimated at 20 meters wide exploded <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scientificamerican.com\/article\/the-asteroid-blast-that-shook-the-world-is-still-making-an-impact1\/\">over the city of Chelyabinsk<\/a> in Russia, shattering windows and injuring hundreds of people.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"image-QCMEC default-d-EpU\" data-block=\"contentful\/image\" style=\"--w:972;--h:683\" data-disable-apple-news=\"true\"><picture><source media=\"(min-width: 0px)\" srcset=\"https:\/\/static.scientificamerican.com\/dam\/m\/3813f0290dcecc9b\/original\/near_earth_asteroid_2024_yr4_very_large_telescope_observations_animation.gif?m=1738357720.354&amp;w=600 600w, https:\/\/static.scientificamerican.com\/dam\/m\/3813f0290dcecc9b\/original\/near_earth_asteroid_2024_yr4_very_large_telescope_observations_animation.gif?m=1738357720.354&amp;w=750 750w, https:\/\/static.scientificamerican.com\/dam\/m\/3813f0290dcecc9b\/original\/near_earth_asteroid_2024_yr4_very_large_telescope_observations_animation.gif?m=1738357720.354&amp;w=900 900w, https:\/\/static.scientificamerican.com\/dam\/m\/3813f0290dcecc9b\/original\/near_earth_asteroid_2024_yr4_very_large_telescope_observations_animation.gif?m=1738357720.354&amp;w=972 972w\" sizes=\"(min-width: 972px) 972px, (min-resolution: 3dppx) 50vw, (min-resolution: 2dppx) 75vw, 100vw\"\/><img loading=\"lazy\" alt=\"This animation is a sequence of observations of the Near Earth Asteroid 2024 YR4 carried out with ESO\u2019s Very Large Telescope in January 2025, shortly after it was discovered in December 2024. The images have been aligned so that the asteroid remains fixed at the centre of the frame, while the stars appear to move in the background\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/static.scientificamerican.com\/dam\/m\/3813f0290dcecc9b\/original\/near_earth_asteroid_2024_yr4_very_large_telescope_observations_animation.gif?m=1738357720.354&amp;w=900\" width=\"972\" height=\"683\" srcset=\"https:\/\/static.scientificamerican.com\/dam\/m\/3813f0290dcecc9b\/original\/near_earth_asteroid_2024_yr4_very_large_telescope_observations_animation.gif?m=1738357720.354&amp;w=600 600w, https:\/\/static.scientificamerican.com\/dam\/m\/3813f0290dcecc9b\/original\/near_earth_asteroid_2024_yr4_very_large_telescope_observations_animation.gif?m=1738357720.354&amp;w=750 750w, https:\/\/static.scientificamerican.com\/dam\/m\/3813f0290dcecc9b\/original\/near_earth_asteroid_2024_yr4_very_large_telescope_observations_animation.gif?m=1738357720.354&amp;w=900 900w, https:\/\/static.scientificamerican.com\/dam\/m\/3813f0290dcecc9b\/original\/near_earth_asteroid_2024_yr4_very_large_telescope_observations_animation.gif?m=1738357720.354&amp;w=972 972w\" sizes=\"auto, (min-width: 972px) 972px, (min-resolution: 3dppx) 50vw, (min-resolution: 2dppx) 75vw, 100vw\"\/><\/picture><figcaption>\n<div>\n<p>The near-Earth asteroid 2024 YR4, as seen by the European Southern Observatory\u2019s Very Large Telescope in January 2025, shortly after the object was discovered in December 2024. As of January 29, 2025, the asteroid has an almost 99 percent chance of safely passing Earth on December 22, 2032, but a possible impact cannot yet be entirely ruled out.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"\" data-block=\"sciam\/paragraph\">While we can\u2019t say for sure where YR4 would strike our planet, we can geographically constrain where Earth would possibly take the hit based on the projected impact date of December 22, 2032, says Daniel Bamberger, an amateur astronomer in Germany, who has calculated the asteroid\u2019s possible impact corridor. The area under threat is a swath extending from the Pacific Ocean through northern South America, the Atlantic Ocean, sub-Saharan Africa, the Arabian Sea and parts of South Asia. \u201cWe knew we would one day find such an object with a reasonably high chance of impact,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n<p class=\"\" data-block=\"sciam\/paragraph\">Although apparently remote, the impact risk of YR4 remains worthy of notice, says Richard Binzel, a planetary scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who created the Torino scale in 1997. A roughly 1 percent chance seems vanishingly small, and late 2032 may seem far-off, but the odds can rapidly worsen, and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scientificamerican.com\/article\/how-to-save-the-world-from-apocalyptic-asteroids\/\">attempts to deflect or mitigate an impactor<\/a> would require years to plan and execute. As astronomers get further views of the asteroid and better track its orbit, its Torino ranking may drop to level 1 and ultimately 0. But if instead such orbital refinements reveal YR4 on an ever tightening trajectory toward our planet, its assessed hazard could ascend to level 8 on the scale, the highest level possible for an asteroid of this size. \u201cLevel 8 means a certain collision,\u201d Binzel says.<\/p>\n<p class=\"\" data-block=\"sciam\/paragraph\">The risk of the asteroid hitting our planet could be promptly dismissed if astronomers find historical observations of YR4 from long-running surveys and gain knowledge of its trajectory over a long period of time. \u201cIt would immediately be clear if there was an impact or no impact,\u201d Bamberger says. \u201cThat would be the end of the story.\u201d Astronomers think such observations might have occurred during telescope surveys that were operational when the asteroid was calculated to have made a previous pass by Earth in 2016, but so far, archival searches have come up short. \u201cWe have been doing this for two weeks now, and unfortunately we haven\u2019t succeeded,\u201d Cano says.<\/p>\n<p class=\"\" data-block=\"sciam\/paragraph\">And time is of the essence. The asteroid is currently moving away from Earth, and by April, it will no longer be visible to telescopes. Outside this slim window of opportunity, the next chance to observe the asteroid to assess its threat won\u2019t arrive until YR4 next swoops near Earth in 2028\u2014the only such pass before the unnerving deadline of December 22, 2032. If the asteroid still poses an impact risk by then, there would be perilously little time to stand up a robust response. Prudence may thus demand devising a mitigation strategy in the interim on the off chance\u2014even if remote\u2014that the asteroid could hit.<\/p>\n<p class=\"\" data-block=\"sciam\/paragraph\">\u201cWhen it comes whipping by in 2028, we could have a mission basically all ready to go when new observations come in,\u201d Tonry says. Alternatively, he adds, \u201cwe could decide to leave it alone\u201d if forecasts show the asteroid won\u2019t strike Earth.<\/p>\n<p class=\"\" data-block=\"sciam\/paragraph\">Preparations for such a precautionary response could begin as soon as next week, when, by chance, meetings of the United Nations\u2019 Space Mission Planning Advisory Group and the International Asteroid Warning Network will take place between space agencies. \u201cWe\u2019re going to be looking very carefully at this object,\u201d Cano says. If the risk of impact cannot be ruled out before this April, the prospect of a deflection mission in 2028 might need to be seriously discussed. \u201cEight years until the [potential] impact is a very challenging scenario,\u201d Cano says. \u201cIt takes between three to five years to design and build a mission. It would be really constrained.\u201d Such a mission design could be similar to NASA\u2019s Double Asteroid Redirection Test, which <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scientificamerican.com\/article\/nasas-asteroid-bashing-dart-mission-was-wildly-successful\/\">successfully changed the orbit<\/a> of an asteroid by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scientificamerican.com\/article\/nasas-dart-spacecraft-successfully-smacks-a-space-rock-now-what1\/\">slamming into it<\/a> in September 2022.<\/p>\n<p class=\"\" data-block=\"sciam\/paragraph\">If deflection is not an option, the next one might be to explore \u201cevacuation measures on the ground\u201d in the predicted impact region, Farnocchia says. If the asteroid\u2019s threat doesn\u2019t dissipate as expected, such <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scientificamerican.com\/article\/nasa-asteroid-threat-practice-drill-shows-were-not-ready\/\">dire discussions<\/a> would be years away, assuming they happen at all. The overwhelmingly likely scenario is that more observations of YR4 will prove that it will miss our planet and pose no risk. And there are plenty of available telescopes that can make those observations. Cano says he has applied for time on NASA\u2019s James Webb Space Telescope to observe the asteroid, while Brucker says she could use the Keck Observatory in Hawaii to seek out YR4.<\/p>\n<p class=\"\" data-block=\"sciam\/paragraph\">Amid so much unsettling uncertainty, the rapid progression of astronomers\u2019 responses to YR4 offers reasons for optimism. As powerless as we may sometimes feel against natural disasters\u2014especially ones as extreme as the universe hurling a space rock at Earth\u2019s face\u2014the global imperative to track and study potentially threatening asteroids is paying off. Decades ago it was a tall order to simply detect an object like YR4 in the first place, not to mention precisely tracking its path and possibility for destruction. Today space scientists are remarkably close to completing their census of sizable near-Earth objects to determine just how dangerous any really are. \u201cAll of the efforts that we have been doing in the last 20 years are fully devoted to finding asteroids and evaluating the chances that they will impact Earth,\u201d Cano says. \u201cThat\u2019s why we are here.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"\" data-block=\"sciam\/paragraph\"><i>Editor\u2019s Note (1\/31\/24): This article was edited after posting to correct the name of the asteroid 2024 YR4.<\/i><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scientificamerican.com\/article\/will-asteroid-2024-yr24-strike-earth-in-2032\/\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In late December astronomers using the Asteroid Terrestrial-Impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) telescope in Chile observed a new asteroid near our planet. Dubbed 2024 YR4,<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":294769,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[179],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-294768","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-science"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/newhampshiredigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/294768","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/newhampshiredigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/newhampshiredigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newhampshiredigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newhampshiredigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=294768"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/newhampshiredigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/294768\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newhampshiredigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/294769"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/newhampshiredigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=294768"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newhampshiredigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=294768"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newhampshiredigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=294768"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}