\n<\/p>\n
May 20, 2020<\/p>\n
It has become fashionable in traditionalist circles to blame all Nouvelle th<\/em>\u00e9ologie<\/em> is not a unified movement A broad-brush approach to the nouvelle Links<\/strong><\/p>\n DeClue\u2019s Views https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCq3P-y0YV1V6owHdCRw4I3A<\/a><\/p>\n Richard DeClue\u2019s blog, Sapientia Nulliformis<\/em> Episode 38: The Sacred Monster, on Garrigou-Lagrange This podcast is a production of CatholicCulture.org. If you like
\nproblems in modern theology on the so-called nouvelle
\nth<\/em>\u00e9ologie<\/em>, including a range of thinkers such as
\nHenri de Lubac, Karl Rahner, Hans Urs von Balthasar, Hans K\u00fcng and
\nJosef Ratzinger. But this is based on a number of misconceptions:
\nabout the nature of the nouvelle th<\/em>\u00e9ologie<\/em>
\nitself, and about the views held by some of these theologians.<\/p>\n
\nin which everyone held the same views. Some of the \u201cnew
\ntheologians\u201d were radicals and modernists who wanted the Church to
\nbow to the modern world. Some were orthodox men who wanted to
\nrevitalize theology by a return to the sources: the Fathers,
\nScripture, and St. Thomas (in his own words, not as filtered
\nthrough the commentators). Others were harder to pin down.<\/p>\n
\nth<\/em>\u00e9ologie<\/em> has resulted in injustices, perhaps as much
\nto theology itself as to some good Churchmen whose reputations have
\nbeen tarnished. Even Ratzinger has been dubbed a modernist by a
\ncertain trigger-happy trad celebrity. It\u2019s time for an
\nintervention, and theologian Richard DeClue is here to bring some
\nsobriety.<\/p>\n
\nhttps:\/\/declubac.wixsite.com\/sapientianulliformis<\/a><\/p>\n
\nhttps:\/\/www.catholicculture.org\/commentary\/episode-38-sacred-monster-matthew-k-minerd\/<\/a><\/p>\n
\nthe show, please consider supporting us! http:\/\/catholicculture.org\/donate\/audio<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n