Scientists can now rewire living brains

The human brain holds around 86 billion neurons, wired together in a vast web of hundreds of trillions of connections. These connections, bridged by structures called synapses, form circuits responsible for everything we feel, perceive and do. And they constantly shift as we grow, learn, make memories and form habits.

Neuroscientists have long sought to hack into these circuits to understand how the brain works. Just 20 years ago they developed a technique called optogenetics, which offered some of the first glimpses of these circuits in action—it uses light to turn cells, including brain cells, on and off.

The work won three scientists the 2026 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. If brain pathways were highways, optogenetics would be akin to “controlling the volume of traffic on a road network that’s already built,” says Sangkyu Lee, a neurobiologist at the Institute for Basic Science in South Korea.

---

On supporting science journalism

If you’re enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

---

Better yet, however, would be “changing the structure of the ‘road’ itself,” Lee says—by actually editing the brain’s connections. More recently, scientists have figured out how to add new connections and delete existing ones, and they have used these techniques to change animals’ behavior and even to implant memories. Ultimately, these tools could yield discoveries about the brain and potentially even treatments for psychiatric conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), schizophrenia and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).

“The idea that, by manipulating brain activity, you could, in principle, make someone happy or sad, or thirsty or hungry, is incredible when you think about the ramifications,” says Don Arnold, a neurobiologist at the University of Southern California.

Making Connections

Kafui Dzirasa, a psychiatrist at Duke University, stumbled into “synaptic engineering” by accident. He had been trying to develop treatments for psychiatric conditions using brain-machine interfaces to alter neural activity. Electrodes would pick up activity in one brain region and cause a computer to stimulate another—essentially “wiring” the two regions together. But as a potential treatment for mental illness, it was impractical. So Dzirasa began contemplating other ways to connect two disparate brain regions.

“We realized that’s what a synapse does, so we thought, ‘Why don’t we just create a synapse?’” he says.

Neurobiologists had already developed a way to do this in a creature with a very simple brain: the nematode worm Caenorhabditis elegans. It has only around 300 neurons, making it ideal for neuroscientists to study. In 2014 Ithai Rabinowitch, a neurobiologist at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and his colleagues successfully altered the worms’ behavior by rewiring their neural circuits.

The team did this by creating a kind of synapse that passes electrically charged particles between two cells through special protein channels. These proteins are made by genes that are snuck into cells’ DNA using a specially programmed virus. Rabinowitch’s team inserted mouse synapse proteins into the worms, which created artificial connections that didn’t interfere with worms’ existing synapses. The researchers were able to alter a circuit governing the worms’ sense of smell, causing them to avoid an odor they previously found attractive.

This technique has since been used to study neural circuits involved in everything from defecation to learning. In one striking example, another team of researchers used it to rewire a memory. First, they trained worms to prefer a specific temperature. Then they bypassed the memory with an electrical synapse, causing the worms to move toward warmer temperatures instead. “It’s like an inception experiment, where you plant a memory by making an artificial connection,” says that study’s senior author Daniel Colón-Ramos, a cell biologist at the Yale School of Medicine.

But could this approach work in the more complex brains of mammals? As brains get bigger and more complicated, the potential for unintended connections is harder to prevent—these can wreak havoc, potentially causing death. “You need to achieve much more control and precision in an animal with billions of neurons,” Colón-Ramos says.

In a study published in May, Dzirasa, Colón-Ramos and their team proved the technique could be done in a mouse. They created synapse proteins that only connected to a specially engineered partner—not to each other or to synapse proteins that were already in the mouse’s brain. They used the tool to connect different cell types in two brain circuits, producing changes in the mice’s behavior.

Some of these behavioral changes offer hints at parallels in human brains. In a study posted to the preprint server bioRxiv last March, Dzirasa and his colleagues tested the tool in mice with a genetic mutation that caused repetitive grooming behaviors reminiscent of OCD. The researchers introduced synapses to bypass the disrupted circuit, which reduced this pathological behavior. “That’s a clear demonstration of the potential power of this in thinking about human diseases,” Dzirasa says.

Adding Subtraction

Researchers have developed other techniques for engineering new connections, too. But some situations may call for the opposite approach: deleting existing connections. For instance, PTSD can cause otherwise innocuous sights or sounds to trigger anxiety. These reactions may stem from connections formed between sensory neurons and “negative emotion” cells in the amygdala.

“It’s tantalizing to think, if you could wipe those synapses out, maybe you’d get rid of this,” Arnold says.

So far, synapse-deleting tools are much less precise than synapse-adding ones. For example, Arnold and his colleagues discovered a technique that degrades proteins that hold synapses together, deleting them from neurons en masse. Last year they expanded this into a toolkit that can delete only inhibitory or only excitatory synapses (which respectively make neurons less or more likely to fire) and that can be activated with light or chemicals.

And in a study in April, Lee and his colleagues described a slightly more precise synapse-deleting tool called Synthetic Trogocytosis, or SynTrogo, which works by recruiting astrocytes, a type of brain cell that prunes synapses naturally. Using special “lock” and “key” proteins to trigger pruning, Lee’s team was able to delete less than a third of specific cell types’ synapses in two parts of mice’s hippocampus, a brain region that is crucial for memory. The remaining connections became stronger, and the mice showed better performance than unedited animals in memory tests. This finding hints at potential applications in neurodevelopmental conditions that involve abnormal connectivity, such as schizophrenia, but also those involving memory impairment, such as dementia.

Having techniques that can delete as well as add synapses “gives much more versatility,” Colón-Ramos says. “You have a gas pedal, but now you also have brakes, so you can do much more.”

Looking ahead, Rabinowitch envisages a day when scientists can construct designer connectomes—entire brains’ worth of custom connections. “You sit by your computer and say, ‘Let’s build this brain,’” he says. “Then it spills out the list of genes you need to introduce into the organism, and you build your synthetic connectome.” Ultimately, this could produce edited animals that perform specific tasks or even artificial life, Rabinowitch says.

We are a long way from these techniques being used in humans. Optogenetics, the 20-year-old, Nobel Prize–winning technology, has only just proven itself safe in trials of human treatments.

To edit human circuits, researchers will have to figure out how to safely deliver DNA across the blood-brain barrier and into neurons. Scientists are working on brain delivery systems, but “that’s a barrier nobody’s really solved yet,” Arnold says. And no one knows how safe these new tools are. “We’re starting to test if human tissue can tolerate them,” Dzirasa says.

And perhaps more critically, researchers need to understand human brain function better before they can usefully intervene. Synaptic engineering may be just what’s needed to figure this out, however. “If you don’t know how something works, you cannot fix it,” Colón-Ramos says. “These tools will lead to the knowledge we need for any aspiration of healing.”